โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ-หห เผปโเผบ หห-โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
Romanticize: deal with or describe in an idealized or unrealistic fashion; make (something) seem better or more appealing than it really is.
I looked up the definition on Google lmao
๐ฆometimes I worry that by putting as much work as I do into making this blog all pretty and aesthetically pleasing to my own eyes is like lowkey doing more harm than good. Am I glamorizing a story of abuse? Am I sacrificing the meaning behind the story just so that my stupid blog looks pretty? I don’t know.
I even feel like the way that I talk about the book in my blog posts isn’t particularly good. Because I feel that by analyzing it like its a beautiful literary take on two complex characters, I’m basically diminishing the reality of abusive behavior throughout the book.
Lana Del Ray has a few songs that romanticize Lolita. โOff To The Racesโ has lyrics that include the first lines of the novel. Lana Del Ray has two other songs titled “Lolita” and “Carmen”. Both songs are references to the novel and revolve around youth and male attraction. The story of Dolores Haze’s abuse and trauma became hidden behind vintage aesthetics which is so depressing. As much as I love my girl Lana, these songs have DEFINITELY played a role into the unhealthy view that some have when it comes to the novel and its themes.
Even all the different covers of the novel all play a role in the hyper sexualization of young girls in American culture which is literally DIGUSTING. All the various covers that depict a girl are always done in such a gross and revolting manner; they’re always like half naked or acting “grown”– AND THEY ARE ALWAYS *YOUNG*! Even the cover of the book I have is gross in my opinion. I feel like putting a girl on the cover just makes a Lolita another thing to look at or gaze upon just as Humbert did and it just makes me feel super duper ICKY. All the covers with a little girl putting on makeup or posed in a “seductive” manner just perpetuate the pedophilic male gaze to an uncomfortable degree. I’m pretty sure the author HIMSELF (Vladimir Nabokov) didn’t want a girl to be placed on the cover. What a cruel world that we live in.
AND I’VE READ A FEW TIMES- PEOPLE ACTUALLY HAVE THE AUDACITY TO SAY THAT THIS BOOK IS A LOVE STORY. A ?? LOVE ??? STORY ???? If you think that this book is a love story, I wholeheartedly believe that there are more than a couple things that you have to reflect on.
I think that a lot of the time, people forget that Humbert is actually a pedophile and is greasy and gross and unclean and grimy in every way possible. I feel like a lot of people just like- ignore the fact that Humbert is an unreliable narrator and we’re seeing everything through his own twisted perception. He doesn’t love Lolita, he never did. Even his use of the nickname Lolita proves that Humbert never saw her for who she was but instead projected such fabrication he had of her onto reality. When you remove all the intricately written descriptions that come with Nabokov’s style, you’re left with the sad and distorted perception of a delusional man.
I feel like if Vladimir Nabokov was alive and saw how a select few certain people have interpreted his work, he would be so disappointed.
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ-หห เผปโเผบ หห-โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ